The justices’ unsigned order came in response to an emergency request filed earlier this week by a group of Black voters in Georgia. The request came as part of their challenge to the state’s “at-large” method for selecting members to Georgia’s Public Service Commission, which governs the cost of electricity and other utilities.
Under this policy, candidates for the Public Service Commission must reside in one of the five districts they are running to represent. However, voters across Georgia may cast ballots for all five seats, a process that can make it more difficult for racial minorities to elect candidates of their choosing.
THE UNSEEN VICTIMS OF WAR: HOW RUSSIA'S INVASION LEFT THOUSANDS OF DISABLED UKRAINIANS IN PERIL
Earlier this month, U.S. District Judge Steven Grimberg judged that Georgia’s negligence to use districts for electing commissioners illegally dilutes the vote of Black citizens in violation of the Voting Rights Act.
However, last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit voted 2-1 to stop Grimberg’s ruling. The appeals court deemed the ruling too close to the November election when two of the commission’s five seats were up for a vote, which started the Georgia voters’ emergency request to the Supreme Court.
WATCH: BYRON DONALDS ENGAGES WITH HAMAS SUPPORTERS
Nico Martinez, a lawyer with the firm Bartlit Beck who represents the plaintiffs, hailed the justices’ Friday ruling.
WATCH MAYOR ADAMS: "YOU DON'T TAKE OVER OUR BUILDINGS AND PUT ANOTHER FLAG UP"
“We are pleased that the Supreme Court took this important step toward ensuring that this November’s [Public Service Commission] elections are not held using a method that unlawfully dilutes the votes of millions of Black citizens in Georgia,” Martinez said. “We look forward to presenting the merits of our case on appeal and are confident the district court’s well-reasoned decision will ultimately be upheld.”
WATCH: DOJ SET TO INDICT TEXAS DEMOCRAT REP.HENRY CUELLER, WHAT'S AT STAKE, YOU ASK?
An attorney for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger (R), the named defendant in the case, did not directly respond to a request for comment.
However, the justices’ order raising the 11th Circuit’s stay may not be the final word on the matter. The Supreme Court returned the case to the intermediate appeals court and left the door open for the 11th Circuit court to apply a more strict legal analysis of Georgia officials’ stay request.
“The conservative 11th Circuit gets another crack at this under the traditional stay factors, and they could side with Georgia officials on this second bite at the apple,” Rick Hasen, a law professor at UCLA, wrote on the Election Law Blog.
Discover alternative ideas that will make you think
Engage in mind bending debate
Earn points, rise in rank, have fun
