Three Major Lawsuits: U.S. Government Could Be On The Hook For Billions To Former U.S. Service Members

Written By BlabberBuzz | Wednesday, 06 December 2023 02:45 AM
1
Views 5.1K

In a significant legal development, three lawsuits have been filed on behalf of former U.S. service members, with the potential to evolve into a class action suit.

The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys Dale Saran, Andy Meyer, and Brandon Johnson, claim they were unfairly discharged or barred from drilling, leading to substantial financial losses due to the Biden administration's vaccine mandate policies.

As reported by Breitbart, these lawsuits, currently in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, could result in backpay claims amounting to billions of dollars.

 FROM SKEPTIC TO SUPPORTER: HOW PETE HEGSETH WON OVER THIS HARSH CRITIC!bell_image

Saran, a retired Marine, underscored the enormity of the potential compensation, stating to Breitbart, “It’s worth billions. That’s just flat-out. That’s what it is in backpay. It’s billions of dollars.” This comment highlights the potential financial consequences of the lawsuit for the Department of Defense.

 WATCH: PENTAGON ‘SPY HUNTER’ CAUGHT SPILLING SECRETS ON TRUMP IN UNDERCOVER STING!bell_image

The court, established during the Reconstruction Era, is renowned for addressing cases related to illegal discharge and pay-related grievances within the military.

Saran elucidated its unique function, stating that the Court of Claims is the place where service members can present a claim and assert, “Hey, I was illegally discharged, or the military did something to impede my pay.”

 JAMES WOODS SHARING HOW HIS NEIGHBOR SAVED HOMES IN THE NEIGHBORHOODbell_image

Breitbart reports that the lawsuits allege that between 80,000 to 100,000 service members, encompassing both active-duty personnel and reservists, were affected by the Biden administration's actions.

Saran highlighted the absence of due process in these cases, noting, “They were basically [without] the benefit of any due process. No boards were held.

 WHY BIDEN’S LATEST CUBA MOVE HAS MARCO RUBIO AND TED CRUZ ALL FIRED UP!bell_image

They didn’t hold any administrative separation boards; they didn’t hold any hearings. They didn’t do any federal recognition boards; none of the administrative or judicial procedures were used. They just flat-out did it.”

One case of note involves former Coast Guard member Zach Loesch, who was praised by President Joe Biden for his bravery during Hurricane Ian but was discharged for not complying with a vaccine mandate, as reported by Breitbart.

 FIERY FALLOUT: ARE CALIFORNIA’S WOKE POLITICS FUELING THE FLAMES?bell_image

The claims also encompass the repayment of enlistment bonuses, further escalating the financial stakes. Saran stated, “Not only did they throw them out — unceremoniously [and] wrongfully — now they’re…without a job instantly, no separation pay, none of that.

 WATCH: AH...THE TIME HAS COME FOR KAMALA'S LAST WORD SALAD—LET'S ENJOY IT!bell_image

And instead, they’re standing out in the cold, and worse yet, here comes the government…here comes the debt collectors. Now you owe us money.”

Saran drew parallels between the current situation involving service members adversely affected by the COVID-19 vaccine mandate policies and his previous experience defending service members who refused the Anthrax vaccine in the late 1990s.

 MEGYN KELLY BLASTING JENNIFER ANISTONbell_image

“I did some work on the lawsuit Doe v. Rumsfeld that shut down the anthrax vaccine,” he said. “And so…here we are, second go around again, 15 years in, and we’re right back at the mass vaccination of unlicensed vaccines like the government didn’t learn last time.”

 GRAVE MATTERS: RADICAL ACTIVISTS DEFACE THIS MAJOR HISTORICAL FIGURE'S FINAL RESTING PLACE! bell_image

Saran indicated that those interested in more information about the ongoing lawsuits can visit militarybackpay.com. The continuing legal battle, with cases such as Bassen v. USA, Botello v. USA, and Harkins v. USA, represents a significant juncture in military legal history.

It raises critical questions about due process, financial liability, and the broader implications for the rights of U.S. service members.

X