The interview grew heated as Ramaswamy expressed his belief that candidates who rely heavily on super PACs to run their campaigns do not align with the values of the Republican Party. Hannity, acknowledging their differing views, criticized Ramaswamy for not voting Republican until 2020. In response, Ramaswamy defended himself, stating that he is an outsider who is not beholden to any political party.
The conversation took a sharp turn when Ramaswamy praised Tucker Carlson, co-founder of the Daily Caller, for having a thoughtful conversation during a previous interview. Hannity, interrupting, made it clear that he also has a good relationship with Carlson. This exchange highlighted the tension between the two men.
WATCH: NICOLE WALLACE AND THE END OF DEMOCRACY
October 14, 2023
Ramaswamy, who had previously warned Carlson about the potential for the Israel-Hamas conflict to escalate into a global conflict, reiterated his commitment to avoiding World War III during his discussion with Hannity. The candidate emphasized the vulnerability of the United States to similar attacks and made it clear that preventing another world war is a top priority for him.
EIGHT U.S. NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS TAKE ON AI GIANTS IN BRAZEN LAWSUIT
Hannity accused Ramaswamy of denying his own words, possibly referring to the candidate's response to an article from the Washington Free Beacon that he claimed took his quotes out of context. Ramaswamy stood firm in his opposition to the article, thanking Hannity for being transparent about his objectives but criticizing him for buying into the mainstream media narrative.
YIKES! IS MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE LOSING HER 'GRIP' IN POWER STRUGGLE?
The interview concluded abruptly when Hannity dismissed Ramaswamy's appearance and asserted that individuals who have never held public office, like Ramaswamy, are not qualified to be president. This final statement highlighted the fundamental disagreement between the two men on the qualifications necessary for the highest office in the land.