Must See: Alan Dershowitz Surprises Everyone With His Legal Assessment Of Trump

By Gil Cohen | Sunday, 28 August 2022 02:10 PM
2
Views 2.1K

Attorney Alan Dershowitz, who has previously backed former President Donald Trump in public and in the congressional chambers, claimed there is sufficient evidence to prosecute the former president.

While discussing revelations from the edited affidavit issued Friday, Dershowitz claimed that despite there being enough evidence, prosecutors won't charge Trump due to precedents he dubbed the "Nixon-Clinton standards."

"There is enough evidence here to indict Trump. But Trump will not be indicted, in my view, because the evidence doesn’t pass what I call the Nixon-Clinton standards," Dershowitz said during a segment on Hannity.

"The Nixon standard is: The case has to be so overwhelmingly strong that even Republicans support it," he said. "And the Clinton standard is: Why is this case more serious than Clinton’s case, where there wasn’t a criminal prosecution?"

 WATCH: BRITISH COLONEL RICHARD KEMP REPORTING FROM GAZAbell_image

Dershowitz warned that his evaluations could vary if redacted portions of the affidavit were unleashed to the public, but he stressed that there "should not be an indictment based on what we've seen up to now."

 WATCH: NO CLUE WHY THEY ARE PROTESTING: "I WISH I WAS MORE EDUCATED"bell_image

Outlining distinction with many conservatives, including Trump, Dershowitz also defended Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart's approval of the search warrant that led to the search in August, claiming that "every judge would have made the same ruling."

 TRUMP READY TO DEBATE BIDEN 'ANYWHERE, ANYTIME, ANYPLACE,' BUT WILL IT HAPPEN?bell_image

Nevertheless, he claimed that Attorney General Merrick Garland should never have sought the warrant in the first place, contending that the affidavit indicated "there was no urgency."

"If they wanted a search warrant, if it was so urgent, they could have gotten it five months ago. And even when they got the search warrant, they waited two days. There was no justification for a search warrant. So if you want to talk about who's to blame here, it's not Reinhardt, it's the attorney general of the United States — he should never have sought a search warrant," Dershowitz said.

 CRITICS SLAM BIDEN'S ATTEMPT TO RELATE PERSONAL TRAGEDY TO POLICE OFFICER DEATHSbell_image

Fill-in host and former Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) pressed Dershowitz about Reinhart's recusal from a case in June involving a Trump suit against Hillary Clinton, the Democratic National Committee, and others. However, Dershowitz insisted that Reinhart's decision on the search warrant was in step with what any other judge would have done.

 FROM DISGRACE TO REDEMPTION: DAN RATHER TO MAKE UNEXPECTED RETURN TO CBSbell_image

On Aug. 8, a crowd of plainclothes FBI agents raided Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort and reportedly took 26 boxes of material that supposedly included documents with classified markings. Trump has denied wrongdoing and filed a motion to block the Justice Department from reviewing the material.

 KARMA IS A B*TCH: COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO CRITICIZED NYPD NOW BEGGING FOR THEIR PROTECTIONbell_image

The affidavit explaining the August search and seizure shed light on the 184 documents with classified markings retrieved from the lavish Palm Beach, Florida, resort in January by the National Archives and Records Administration that sparked the DOJ inquiry. At least 67 documents in the batch were marked "confidential," 92 were marked "secret," and 25 were designated "top secret," per the affidavit.

X