A federal judge threw a lawsuit against Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) that aimed to stop the dismantling of the Walt Disney World Resort’s Reedy Creek Improvement District. U.S. District Judge Cecilia Altonaga decided Tuesday that the federal court lacked evidence because it was a state issue, the plaintiffs’ First Amendment arguments were poor. The lawsuit was premised on a piece of legislation that does not go into effect until July. [tweet_embed] May 13, 2022[/tweet_embed] “In Count I, Plaintiffs allege that Senate Bill 4-C violates Florida’s Reedy Creek Improvement Act and ‘contractual obligations’ the state owes to Floridians,” Altonaga, a Bush appointee, wrote. “The Court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ sole remaining claim for violating Disney’s First Amendment rights. ‘[A] party generally may assert only his or her own rights and cannot raise the claims of third parties not before the court.’” In the 1960s, Florida established RCID as a special district under the Reedy Creek Improvement Act. The landowners run RCID in the district, especially Disney, which manages essential local government functions such as zoning, infrastructure, and building codes. The lawsuit was filed last week by William Sanchez, a Democratic contender for Senate. Michael and Edward Foronda, and Vivian Gorsky were listed as plaintiffs. The suit questioned a bill DeSantis signed last month denying RCID of its special district status. [tweet_embed] May 13, 2022[/tweet_embed] They argued that SB 4-C violates the Florida Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights and Reedy Creek Improvement Act, but Altonaga ruled those were state laws outside the federal court’s jurisdiction. She also noted the legislation in question had not yet taken effect. “None of the Plaintiffs’ claims is ripe. Senate Bill 4-C does not take effect until July 1, 2022,” the judge said. “When a plaintiff files ’a pre-enforcement, a constitutional challenge to a state statute, the injury requirement may be satisfied by establishing a realistic danger of sustaining a direct injury as a result of the statute’s operation or enforcement.’” Critics such as Sanchez claimed that DeSantis’s action was done against Disney for its vocal resistance to the Parental Rights in Education bill. Disney and Florida Republicans had been ensnared in a weekslong war of words over the controversial legislation. DeSantis claims he supported the legislation to dissolve RCID’s special district status because “I’m just not comfortable having that type of agenda get special treatment in my state.” In response to DeSantis signing the bill, RCID issued a statement claiming that the state would be on the hook for its roughly $1 billion in outstanding debt — something DeSantis has disputed. [tweet_embed] May 13, 2022[/tweet_embed] “In light of the State of Florida’s pledge to the District’s bondholders, Reedy Creek expects to explore its options while continuing its present operations, including levying and collecting its ad valorem taxes and collecting its utility revenues, paying debt service on its ad valorem tax bonds and utility revenue bonds, complying with its bond covenants and operating and maintaining its properties,” RCID said in a statement, per CNN.