As Red States Secure Second Amendment, Dems Inventing Ways To Get Around Them

Written By BlabberBuzz | Friday, 16 April 2021 07:30 PM
18
Views 6.8K

Democrats in Congress have proposed firearm legislation that would ban the sale, transfer, possession, manufacture, or importation of magazines that can hold over 10 rounds.

Several states including New York and California have previously imposed similar bans. Magazines that held more than 10 rounds were banned under the Federal Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which expired in 2004.

On April 14, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) as well as Reps. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Dina Titus (D-Nev.), and Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) introduced the measure, called “Keep Americans Safe Act.”

The Department of Justice has previously said that the 1994 federal ban didn’t lead to a significant drop in shootings and murders. That study has been often cited by gun-rights groups including the National Rifle Association (NRA) and Gun Owners of America for why such legislation would be ineffective.

 WATCH: BYRON DONALDS ENGAGES WITH HAMAS SUPPORTERSbell_image

“We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence,” the DOJ stated in 2004. “Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement.”

 THE UNSEEN VICTIMS OF WAR: HOW RUSSIA'S INVASION LEFT THOUSANDS OF DISABLED UKRAINIANS IN PERILbell_image

Menendez said in an April 14 statement that the bill is designed to end mass shootings, such as last month’s incidents in Boulder, Colorado, and Atlanta.

 WATCH MAYOR ADAMS: "YOU DON'T TAKE OVER OUR BUILDINGS AND PUT ANOTHER FLAG UP"bell_image

“High-capacity magazines are good for one thing and one thing only—high-capacity killing. The Keep Americans Safe Act is a common-sense piece of legislation that will save lives and will finally limit the sale of large-capacity magazines that are designed for killing as many people as possible without having to stop and reload.”

 WATCH: DOJ SET TO INDICT TEXAS DEMOCRAT REP.HENRY CUELLER, WHAT'S AT STAKE, YOU ASK?bell_image

With the 60-vote filibuster in place, it’s unlikely that the current form of the bill would be approved by the Senate. Republicans have signaled opposition to President Joe Biden’s recent executive actions against “ghost guns,” “red flag” law proposals, and re-classifying pistols with stabilizing braces as rifles—as well as his nominee to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF).

 THE HAWAII BILLIONAIRE BATTLE: MEET THE RECLUSIVE RICHEST MAN ON THE ISLAND...bell_image

Menendez’s bill also would modify “the high-capacity definition to prevent coupled or joined magazines,” create a buyback program for magazines holding more than 10 rounds, “requires devices manufactured after enactment to have conspicuous serial numbers and date of manufacture to help law enforcement identify restricted magazines,” and would allow the ATF and FBI to destroy magazines holding more than 10 rounds.

 ELON MUSK ISSUES 'TROUBLESOME' WARNING TO U.S., BUT IS THERE ANY WEIGHT TO IT?bell_image

Gun Owners of America, in a statement, said that the new proposal suggests that its Democratic sponsors have an “ignorance about modern firearm technology and the Bill of Rights.”

“Most modern home defense rifles and carry handguns come standard with magazines that hold more than the arbitrary limit of ten rounds,” the group stated. “The idea that magazines that hold 100, 50, or 30 rounds are neither for sport nor self-defense is a farce. Gun owners commonly equip their self-defense firearms with so-called ‘high capacity magazines’ and shoot them for sport all the time.

 ISRAELI FATHER, BELIEVED TO BE A HAMAS HOSTAGE, CONFIRMED DEADbell_image

“Senator Menendez’s standard capacity magazine ban is obsolete, and Gun Owners of America will make sure it never becomes law.”

X