As Biden Plans To Pack Supreme Court, One Moderate Justice Breaks His Silence

Written By BlabberBuzz | Saturday, 10 April 2021 05:15 AM
7
Views 9.7K

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer throughout an address at Harvard Law School Tuesday spoke out against the tradition of court packing, telling law students such a move could "further erode public trust and weaken the court’s influence."

Citing the denial of former President Donald Trump's election challenge cases, Breyer maintained the court's independence, stating he thinks its authority "rests on a trust that the court is guided by legal principle, not politics.”

“If the public sees justices as ‘politicians in robes,’ its confidence in the courts, and in the rule of law itself, can only diminish, diminishing the court’s power, including its power to act as a ‘check’ on the other branches,” he stated.

Breyer cited four decisions in which the court had frustrated conservatives, including the Affordable Care Act, abortion, the census, and young immigrants.

In each of those 5-4 choices, all that came before Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death, conservative-leaning Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. voted with the liberal wing of the court.

 WATCH: NICOLE WALLACE AND THE END OF DEMOCRACYbell_image

“Structural alteration motivated by the perception of political influence would only feed that perception, further eroding that trust,” Breyer remarked.

 EIGHT U.S. NEWSPAPER PUBLISHERS TAKE ON AI GIANTS IN BRAZEN LAWSUITbell_image

It is his hope to “make those whose initial instincts may favor important structural or other similar institutional changes, such as forms of ‘court-packing,’ think long and hard before embodying those changes in law.”

During the 2020 campaign, President Joe Biden declined to answer questions regarding his stance on court-packing.

 WATCH: FETTERMAN CONFRONTED BY A PRO-HAMAS ACTIVISTbell_image

Through an October interview with CBS' "60 Minutes," Biden stated, "The last thing we need to do is turn the Supreme Court into just a political football, whoever has the most votes gets whatever they want. Presidents come and go. Supreme Court justices stay for generations."

 DESPERATE TIMES: INSIDER REVEALS KING CHARLES HAS 'LOST ALL TRUST' IN PRINCE HARRYbell_image

At the end of January, though, his administration formed a commission to study Supreme Court reform.

At that time, a White House official issued a statement that declared Biden "remains committed to an expert study of the role and debate over reform of the court and will have more to say in the coming weeks."

 PUMP AND DUMP: VIRAL "BOCA BASH" VIDEO SPARKS MAJOR INVESTIGATIONbell_image

Under current Senate rules, 60 votes would be required to (block the filibuster) and pass a bill to increase the Supreme Court.

 PROFESSIONAL "PROTEST CONSULTANT" CAUGHT ON VIDEO STIRRING UP CHAOS AT COLUMBIA UNIVERSITYbell_image

Ohio State University Law School professor Peter Shane told WUSA9, though, that "Senate Democrats could block the filibuster with what’s known as the 'nuclear option,'" which is a change to a Senate rule for a specific item.

The nuclear option was applied by the-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid in 2013 to allow Democrats to approve executive and judicial nominees (with the exception of Supreme Court nominees) with 51 senate votes.

 UNRULY JAPAN AIRLINES PILOT CAUSES CHAOS AND CANCELLATIONbell_image

Reid's move paved the route for his follower, then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, to "go nuclear" for the express purpose of confirming Supreme Court nominees by a simple majority.

Breyer has served on the Supreme Court since 1994.

X