Twitter is requesting that a federal court in Florida dismiss a lawsuit filed by a child sex trafficking victim, who alleged that the social media giant refused to immediately remove explicit content depicting the child on its platform.
The January lawsuit is accusing the Silicon Valley company of knowingly benefiting financially from the dissemination of sexual abuse material in failing to act on multiple complaints and correspondences asking it to remove the illegal and hurtful content.
The content was eventually removed about nine days after the child and his family placed complaints to Twitter. The family and the child victim allege that Twitter only took action because a Department of Homeland Security agent issued a “take-down demand” against the company when other methods to get the company to remove the content failed.
WATCH: BILL BARR HAS A SENSE OF HUMOR AFTER ALL
“Twitter is not a passive, inactive, intermediary in the distribution of this harmful material; rather, Twitter has adopted an active role in the dissemination and knowing promotion and distribution of this harmful material,” the lawsuit states.
MUST WATCH: IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO MAKE THIS UP (FUNNY)
It further alleges that “Twitter’s own policies, practices, business model, and technology architecture encourage and profit from the distribution of sexual exploitation material.”
WATCH: IT STARTS WITH A FLAG, BUT WHERE DOES IT END?
The lawsuit claims that Twitter failed in its duty to report child sexual abuse material, and was negligent in refusing to take action, allowing the content to be viewed over 167,000 times and re-tweeted 2,200 times before it was taken down.
“Twitter’s conduct is an extreme departure from what a reasonably careful person would do in the same situation to prevent harm to others,” the lawsuit argues.
In a court filing on Wednesday, Twitter did not address allegations that it had “refused” to immediately remove the content after the complaints were made.
TESLA'S FUTURE IN JEOPARDY: WILL MUSK'S SURPRISE VISIT TO CHINA TURN THE TIDE?
Instead, it sought to characterize its actions as tardiness in removing the offensive content. The company defended the delay by arguing that the “sheer volume” of Tweets that are posted on the platform renders it “simply not possible for Twitter … to remove all offending content immediately or accurately in all cases.” The company says hundreds of millions of Tweets are posted on the platform every day.
HOW TRUMP'S ENDORSEMENT COULD SWING UTAH'S SENATE RACE...
“The fact that nine days transpired before the offending content was taken down does not make Twitter liable under any applicable law,” Twitter states in its motion to dismiss.
The company is also invoking immunity under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. The provision largely exempts online platforms from liability for content posted by its users, although they can be held liable for content that violates anti-sex trafficking or intellectual property laws.
DEMOCRAT SENATOR TIM KAINE DOWNPLAYS VIOLENT ANTI-ISRAEL PROTESTS ON COLLEGE CAMPUSES
“Given that Twitter’s alleged liability here rests on its failure to remove content from its platform, dismissal of the Complaint with prejudice is warranted on this ground alone,” Twitter argued.
The lawsuit against Twitter seeks to block the platform from continuing to benefit from the illegal content posted on its site, as well as claim damages for the harm caused to the child.
Discover alternative ideas that will make you think
Engage in mind bending debate
Earn points, rise in rank, have fun
