Carlson announced that Jackson’s nomination was a purely political one by Biden and not one based on merit. This, after Biden’s shown intention to apply principles of affirmative action to the Supreme Court nomination process, were heavily critiqued by Conservatives
WATCH: JOHN LEGEND CALLS TRUMP A RACIST
“It might be time for Joe Biden to let us know what Ketanji Brown Jackson’s LSAT score was,” Carlson had announced to his viewers.
RUSSIAN COURT DENIES EVAN GERSHOVICH'S APPEAL, WHAT'S NEXT FOR THE WSJ REPORTER?
“How did she do on the LSATs? Why wouldn’t you tell us that? That would settle the question conclusively as to whether she is a once-in-a-generation legal talent, the next one at hand.”
Reid stated, “As Nicole Hannah-Jones so aptly tweeted, this is textbook racism, not even a dog whistle. Outside of the ridiculous argument that scores to get into law school are the measure of qualification, long after law school, plus a lengthy judicial career. The presumption that black people are dumb is standard white supremacy.”
WATCH FETTERMAN REACTING TO PROTESTS WAVES
” 'Ketanji Brown Jackson has an extensive amount of experience,” Reid continued, “as Elliott Williams tweeted when she was nominated. Imagine a supremely qualified SCOTUS nominee with two Harvard degrees with honors, a SCOTUS clerkship for the justice they’d replace, and two years as a federal judge.’ That’s Chief Justice, John Roberts.”
SQUATTERS BEWARE AS GEORGIA GOVERNOR SIGNS TOUGH NEW LAW
“Ketanji Brown Jackson has all of that, plus seven more years as a judge. In contrast, Amy Coney Barrett was the least qualified nominee in recent history.”
Though, Jackson once authored an unsigned “Note" in the Harvard Law Review arguing that America’s judicial system is “unfair" to sexual predators.
EXECUTION-STYLE AMBUSH: LOS ANGELES DEPUTY ATTACKED BY NOTORIOUS GANG MEMBER
Jackson claimed the unconstitutionality of certain preventative measures adopted as common practices by state governments and applied to confirmed sex offenders.
GENDER WAR ESCALATES AFTER FEDS ANNOUNCE THIS WILL NOW BE A CRIME...
Per the Harvard Law Review article “Prevention Versus Punishment: Toward a Principled Distinction in the Restraint of Released Sex Offenders,” she claimed that America’s judicial approaches might be unjust to sex offenders.
“This Note critiques current judicial approaches to characterizing sex offender statutes and suggests a more principled framework for making the distinction between prevention and punishment,” Jackson announced in the piece.
Jackson maintained that “even in the face of understandable public outrage over repeat sexual predators, a principled prevention/punishment analysis evaluates the effect of the challenged legislation in a manner that reinforces constitutional safeguards against unfair and unnecessarily burdensome legislative action.”
Discover alternative ideas that will make you think
Engage in mind bending debate
Earn points, rise in rank, have fun
