According to RedState, the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the General Assembly’s effort to advance the amendment to voters ran afoul of the state’s own constitutional safeguards, a rebuke to Democrats who attempted to rewrite the rules to secure a long-term electoral advantage.
In its opinion, the court recounted that “On March 6, 2026, the General Assembly of Virginia submitted to Virginia voters a proposed constitutional amendment that authorizes partisan gerrymandering of congressional districts in the Commonwealth. We hold that the legislative process employed to advance this proposal violated Article XII, Section 1 of the Constitution of Virginia. This constitutional violation incurably taints the resulting referendum vote and nullifies its legal efficacy.”
THE SHOCKING ADMISSION THAT COULD KILL VIRGINIA'S ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN
The ruling means the Democrat gerrymandering referendum is void, and the existing map—preserving five Republican-held districts—remains in place for the 2026 midterms. One viral reaction captured the moment succinctly: “?? BREAKING: The Virginia Supreme Court has overturned the Democrat gerrymandering referendum, ruling that the process to put in on the ballot was unconstitutional. Virginia will keep their 5 Republican districts.”
THE TELL-ALL THAT SHATTERED THE 'TERRIBLE TWINS' BOND FOREVER
Democrats and their allies, who poured staggering sums into the effort, now face the political and financial fallout of their failed power grab. As one commentator put it, “The Democrats lit $80 million on fire in Virginia! Virginia State Supreme Court strikes down the clearly unconstitutional redistricting referendum!”
GOP CONGRESSMAN MOVES TO IMPEACH OBAMA-APPOINTED JUDGE AFTER EXPLOSIVE SEX-IN-CHAMBERS PROBE
Election analysts noted that “The 6D-5R congressional map in Virginia has been reinstated for the 2026 midterms by the Supreme Court of Virginia,” underscoring the immediate electoral implications. The court, however, grounded its decision not in partisanship but in constitutional fidelity, stressing that “While the Commonwealth is free by its lights to do the right thing for the right reason, the Rule of Law requires that it be done the right way.”
WNBA PLAYER BRIANNA TURNER CRITICIZES PROPOSED 'USA 250' JERSEY PATCH
In a further defense of constitutional order over political expediency, the justices declared, “This violation irreparably undermines the integrity of the resulting referendum vote and renders it null and void.” They also reminded lawmakers and activists alike that “Constitutions should not be changed lightly,” a principle conservatives have long championed against progressive attempts to manipulate foundational rules for short-term gain. The full ruling can be read here, offering a detailed roadmap of how constitutional process—properly enforced—can still check partisan overreach.
