“I think that’s absolutely what this is. This isn’t as simple as giving up our sovereignty. This is a very complex legal move,” announced Attorney Thomas Renz in an interview with The Epoch Times.
“This is horrendous. To even propose something like this is mindblowing,” Renz stated.
Renz is the lead attorney in many significant cases brought in Ohio, New Mexico, Maine, and nationally, about forced COVID-19 vaccines, illegal lockdowns, big-tech censorship, questionable death numbers, and different pandemic-related matters.
WATCH: ESPN HOST- DEMOCRAT STRATEGY IS NOT WORKING
He presently represents America’s Frontline Doctors and Make Americans Free Again, organizations that oppose unconstitutional federal health mandates.
Renz recently started speaking out against Biden’s 13 suggested amendments to the UN’s International Health Regulations (IHR) that govern WHO operations.
WATCH: 2004 SNL SKETCH: "DONALD TRUMP’S HOUSE OF WINGS”
Such a move, he announced, would give the WHO power to declare public health emergencies in the United States, using whatever proof it wants.
The IHR changes, if embraced, would grant broad authority to WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, a former Ethiopian government minister who has been in the role since 2017.
WELP, CLIMATE WARRIORS HAVE THEIR NEXT TARGET PICKED OUT...
It’s “more than a little suspect,” Renz announced, stressing that any treaty ratified by Congress has roughly the same statutory weight as federal law.
“Federal law has more authority than state law. If there’s a dispute between federal law and state law, federal law wins,” he announced.
“A treaty, if ratified, generally would trump state law. In terms of the U.S., that’s how it works. The question is not whether the WHO can do this, but what kind of an impact [will it have], how does it affect the U.S.—those sorts of things."
TRUMP POINTS (MIDDLE) FINGER AT BIDEN AS PRO-HAMAS DEMONSTRATIONS DESTROY THE IVY'S
“To that extent, it could have indirect authority.”
This week, opposition from African delegates to the 75th World Health Assembly (WHA) in Geneva, Switzerland, has initiated continued discussions over Biden’s suggested amendments.
BREAKING: HAMAS RELEASES PROPAGANDA VIDEO FEATURING ISRAELI-AMERICAN HOSTAGE ALIVE...(WATCH HERE)
Under the U.S. Constitution, Renz announced that Biden could use his executive authority to transfer power to the WHO in public health emergencies, igniting constitutional challenges.
“The Constitution trumps any treaty—period,” Renz stated. “If there’s a dispute between the Constitution and any other law—including a treaty—the Constitution always wins.”
TENSIONS BOIL OVER AS PRO-PALESTINE PROTESTERS ARE ARRESTED OUTSIDE TOP DEM LEADER'S HOME
The WHO’s primary part is to provide input in public health matters, yet it does not have the legal power to direct health policy at the national level.
DEMOCRATIC SENATOR'S 'LATE-NIGHT ADVENTURE' LANDS HER IN VERY STICKY SITUATION
Nevertheless, the IHR amendments could change all that.
“They are proposing to have more authority to do things within a nation,” Renz said. “Does that mean the nation loses its sovereignty? No. The WHO couldn’t come into the United States and do anything the United States couldn’t do constitutionally because the Constitution would be the line in the sand in terms of what they can and cannot do.”
Discover alternative ideas that will make you think
Engage in mind bending debate
Earn points, rise in rank, have fun
