The Employment Tribunal found on Wednesday that the Croydon Health Services NHS Trust mistreated Mary Onuoha when they demanded that he stop wearing a cross to work. The hospital's assertion that the cross necklace posed a high contamination risk was dismissed by the tribunal, noting that other items like rings and hijabs were permitted at the institution.
“There is no evidence to show that the infection risk they posed was lower than the Cross-Necklace,” stated the tribunal. “There is no cogent explanation as to why these items are permitted but a fine necklace with a small pendant of religious devotional significance is not.”
WATCH: BRITAIN'S HEAVIEST MAN HAS PASSED AWAY AT 33
Onuoha "was not merely wearing a necklace," the tribunal continued. It was a Cross-Necklace that was more than a fashion accessory; it was a symbol of religious belief."
PASTOR DODGES BULLET MID-SERMON AFTER MAN "SEES SPIRITS" AND OPENS FIRE
“Subjectively, from the Claimant’s point of view, that created an offensive and threatening environment,” they added. “The conduct was clearly unwanted. The Claimant simply wanted to get on with her job whilst wearing her Cross-Necklace.”
WATCH: AT WHAT POINT WE WILL TAKE THEM SERIOUSLY?
Christian Concern, a London-based nonprofit whose partner organization, the Christian Legal Centre, assisted Onuoha in his legal case, issued a statement applauding the verdict on Wednesday.
“We are delighted that the Tribunal have ruled in Mary’s favor and delivered justice in this case,” Andrea Williams, CEO of the Christian Legal Centre, was quoted in the release as saying.
“From the beginning this case has been about the high-handed attack from the NHS bureaucracy on the right of a devoted and industrious nurse to wear a cross — the worldwide, recognized and cherished symbol of the Christian faith. It is very uplifting to see the Tribunal acknowledge this truth.”
TARGETING DISSIDENTS: THEY ESCAPED THEIR HOMELANDS, BUT DANGER STILL LOOMS FOR THEM HERE, FBI SAYS
Onuoha, a Nigerian native, moved to the UK in 1988 and started working at the hospital in 2001, wearing a cross necklace during her shifts.
JOHN FETTERMAN BELIEVES CAMPUS PROTESTS ARE "WORKING AGAINST PEACE" IN THE MIDDLE EAST
Supervisors began requesting that Onuoha remove the cross in 2015, and in 2018, her superiors argued that the religious jewelry violated the facility's dress code. Before resigning in August 2020, she was compelled to take on administrative tasks rather than her original vocation and faced possible disciplinary action.
MAN'S UNEXPECTED CONFESSION ON SIDE OF OKLAHOMA HIGHWAY SHAKES UP 5-YEAR-OLD COLD CASE
Following her resignation, Onuoha filed a lawsuit against the hospital, alleging religious discrimination by her superiors, with the tribunal hearing oral arguments in October.
"This has always been an attack on my faith," In a statement made last year, Onuoha remarked. "My cross is part of me and my faith, and it has never caused anyone any harm.”
“Hindus wear red bracelets on their wrists and female Muslims wear hijabs [at the hospital]. Yet my small cross around my neck was deemed so dangerous that I was no longer allowed to do my job."
Discover alternative ideas that will make you think
Engage in mind bending debate
Earn points, rise in rank, have fun
