This news has likely brought a sense of relief to King Charles III, according to royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams, who spoke to Fox News Digital. Fitzwilliams suggested that deporting Harry would only serve to refocus the public's attention on the Sussexes, a situation that could lead to an unending stream of publicity. "Harry would undoubtedly appeal. The publicity would be ceaseless," he stated.
As reported by Fox News, Fitzwilliams further explained that the royal family is a significant asset for the UK government when dealing with unpredictable presidents. However, he also pointed out that Harry's self-imposed exile and the royal family's health struggles have led to a lack of trust in the Sussexes. He claimed that Harry and his wife, Meghan Markle, would not be welcomed back to Britain, where their popularity is low, except among the younger demographic. "Regarding his wayward son Harry, it’s far better that he remains out of sight and out of mind. [Charles] remains focused on both his cancer recovery and dedication to duty, serving his people," Fitzwilliams added.
BREAKING NEWS: ANTI-TRUMP FBI AGENT ARRESTED FOR LEAKING CLASSIFIED FILES!
February 16, 2025
British royals expert Hillary Fordwich, also speaking to Fox News Digital, echoed these sentiments, describing Charles as someone who has always avoided conflict. She suggested that Charles would prefer Harry to stay out of the public eye, allowing him to concentrate on his health and his duties. This perspective was supported by Richard Eden of the U.K.'s Daily Mail, who suggested that Charles would find relief in Harry remaining in California with his family.
NOT SO GREEN: GREENPEACE SMACKED WITH MEGA DAMAGES FINE!
The issue of Harry's immigration status came into the spotlight following a lawsuit filed by the conservative think tank, the Heritage Foundation, against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. The lawsuit seeks the release of Harry's immigration records, following his admission in his 2023 memoir "Spare" of past illegal drug use. However, Trump, when asked about the possibility of deporting Harry, responded, "I don’t want to do that. I’ll leave him alone. He’s got enough problems with his wife. She’s terrible."
NETANYAHU GIVES ANOTHER CONTROVERSIAL "GIFT" TO THIS U.S. SENATOR!
Fitzwilliams believes that Trump was never likely to deport Harry, regardless of what was included in his visa application. He suggested that such a move would only serve to boost the Sussexes' popularity in Hollywood, something they have struggled to achieve. "This would have been ironic. Now we know it won’t happen," he stated.
FROM CLASSROOM TO COURTROOM: THE DISGUSTINGLY DARK SIDE OF A BELOVED INDIANA TEACHER!
Fordwich emphasized the importance of the monarchy's continuity to Charles and suggested that it would not have been appropriate for the king to comment publicly on Harry's visa case, as he needs to remain above politics. She also noted that not deporting Harry is likely in Trump's best interest, as he values his relationship with the British royals. "President Trump is no fool, he cherishes his relationship with the British royals and most certainly wouldn’t have spoken out of turn regarding the deportation of Harry as he’s looking forward to his next invitation to Buckingham Palace," she explained.
DEVELOPING NOW: COUP AT ICONIC AMERICAN BRAND OUSTS CEO TO DETACH FROM WOKE VALUES
Despite the common belief that Trump and the environmentally focused Charles have little in common, Fordwich highlighted that they maintained a relationship while Trump was out of office. She also pointed out their shared disapproval of the actions of Harry and Meghan, which they believe caused harm to Queen Elizabeth II in her final years.
THIS JUST IN: TRUMP TURNS THE TABLE ON POWELL TO DO MORE AS THEY TRADE BLOWS
Harry and Meghan, who left the UK in 2020 in a move dubbed "Megxit," have settled in Montecito, California. This move has reportedly deprived Charles of his grandfatherly duties to Harry's children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, and left a significant void, according to British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard. She suggested that while Charles would love a relationship with his son and grandchildren, the unresolved animosity and upset make it difficult. "King Charles has little stamina to fight his sons' battles. Peace and calm is essential as he serves as head of state and focuses on his cancer treatment. The working royal family are a priority," she stated.
WATCH TRUMP ADDRESSING ELECTIONS INTEGRITY
Chard also noted that it's easier for the royal family with the Sussexes living far away as celebrities, describing them as "self-serving disrupters." She concluded, "Perhaps in years to come when all legal cases are finalized, bridges built, trust earned and the negative spotlight is off of the Sussexes, family healing will materialize."
