Black On Black Bigotry: Samuel L. Jackson Just Proved That Black Lives Only Matter If They Are Liberals

By Mark Gruber | Sunday, 26 June 2022 02:10 PM
7
Views 10.2K
Black On Black Bigotry: Samuel L. Jackson Just Proved That Black Lives Only Matter If They Are Liberals

Actor Samuel L. Jackson on Friday launched a racial attack against Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas after the court overruled abortion conclusions in Roe v. Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, effectively kicking abortion regulations back to the states.

“How’s Uncle Clarence feeling about Overturning Loving v Virginia??!!” Jackson posted to Twitter.

“Uncle Clarence” seems to be a reference to “Uncle Tom,” a racial term usually utilized to slander black Americans who buck the mainstream narrative. Merriam-Webster defines “Uncle Tom” as “a Black person who is overeager to win the approval of whites.”

In the same tweet, Jackson took another racial shot at Thomas, seemingly for marrying a white woman, Ginni Thomas. Loving v. Virginia, determined in 1967, struck down state laws banning interracial marriages.

Thomas notably wrote in his concurrence to Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization that the high court “should reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell,” The Daily Wire reported.

 WATCH: "WE WILL OPEN YOU UP LIKE A SOFT PEANUT"bell_image

“We have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents,” Thomas announced. “After overruling these demonstrably erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myriad rights that our substantive due process cases have generated.”

 A LOOK INSIDE DEMOCRATS' PLAN TO WIN BACK THE HOUSE WITH RECORD INVESTMENTbell_image

Obergefell v. Hodges, decided in 2015, discovered that the right to marry was guaranteed to same-sex couples.

 WATCH: HOW WAS JURY SELECTION HANDLED IN TRUMP'S TRIAL?bell_image

Lawyer Jenna Ellis claimed in 2018 that “originalist” judges would discover that both Roe and Obergefell should be overturned — which appears to jive with Thomas’ latest concurrence.

“It should be obvious to anyone who actually reads the Constitution’s text, that rights do not come from the Constitution,” Ellis wrote at The Daily Wire. “But neither Roe nor Planned Parenthood v. Casey found a ‘right to abortion’ in the Constitution anyway. These abortion cases didn’t even suggest this, but rather the Court found that the ‘right to privacy’ covers some abortions in some circumstances. Since these decisions, the Court has sought to ‘balance’ this right to privacy versus the state’s compelling interest in protecting human life. This was established as the ‘undue burden’ test in Casey.”

 WATCH: FORMER OBAMA PRESS SECRETARY'S WIFE HORRIFIED BY SURGE OF ANTI-SEMITISM AT PRESIDENT'S ALMA MATERbell_image

“This was judicial ‘finessing’ to cover up the inherent incongruency of these opinions with the Constitution — Casey, and Roe (and later, Obergefell) was about finding things that aren’t in the Constitution to advance a specific policy agenda rather than faithfully applying the law,” she claimed. “These cases are about imposing the opinion and preferences of a majority of activist judges over the rule of law.”

X