SCOTUS Delivers MASSIVE Blow To Police Haters

Written By BlabberBuzz | Tuesday, 19 October 2021 04:45 PM
3
Views 15.2K

A pair of Supreme Court rulings came out today siding with police officers on the matter of qualified immunity, and the common theme of both cases was excessive force.

The matter of qualified immunity when it comes to law enforcement has been a subject of debate since George Floyd's death last year. Though generally speaking, the doctrine protects police officers from lawsuits, unless there's demonstrable evidence that someone's rights were broken.

Democrat Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts, an opponent of qualified immunity in Congress, reacted with disappointment to today's SCOTUS news.

 WATCH: 1940'S FOOTAGE OF THE TALLEST MAN TO EVER LIVEbell_image

Both of these Supreme Court opinions were unsigned. According to law.com, the meaning of unsigned Supreme Court opinions were originally meant for "routine, non-controversial" matters. Though by the time Chief Justice John Roberts came around, they came to designate divisive issues.

 BRIDGING THE GAP: ONE PROGRAM'S MISSION TO CONNECT YOUTH ACROSS AMERICA'S RED AND BLUE DIVIDEbell_image

Here are the two issues settled on Monday.

1. "California police officer Daniel Rivas-Villegas responded to a domestic abuse call from a 12-year-old afraid that her mother's boyfriend Ramon Cortesluna was going to hurt the family with a chainsaw. When officers responded, Rivas-Villegas had to place his knee on the left side of Cortesluna's back to deal with a knife in Cortez Luna's pocket. He sues the cop over "excessive force," wins in the Ninth Court of Appeals, but then the Supreme Court overturned it, by pointing out how the John LaLonde case the lower courts cited involved an unarmed person whereas Cortesluna was carrying a knife.``

 WATCH: THIS IS A TEACHER! LISTEN TO HIM ADVOCATE FOR MORE RACISMbell_image

2. "Three Oklahoma officers, Brandon Vick, Chase Reed, and Josh Girdner, responded to an ex-wife calling 911 because the former husband, Dominic Rollice, was drunk and wouldn't leave her garage. The officers confront Rollice who ends up grabbing a hammer, raising it behind him in a fashion that made it seem like Rollice was going to attack. The trio of officers opened fire and killed Rollice. His estate sued and the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals said the three "recklessly created the situation," but the Supreme Court overturned it saying none of the cases cited by the lower court established "unlawful conduct" taken place by the officer."

 TURKISH PRESIDENT'S DANGEROUS GAME: HOW HIS SUPPORT FOR HAMAS IS TESTING NATO'S LIMITSbell_image

In CNN's reporting, they make note regarding how there were "two instances where the court wiped away lower court opinions that had granted qualified immunity to government officials, leading some to believe the court was moving in a new direction to chip away at the doctrine."

Though, today's decisions dash those hopes. According to CNBC, congressional attempts at police reform "fell apart" last month as Republicans and Democrats couldn't come to an agreement when it comes to federal legislation.

X