“We have more evidence now than half the prison population is imprisoned on,” Powell told on Friday, answering to a comment from Dominion Voting Systems in dismissing the Trump team’s assertion that software could be manipulated to flip the election against President Donald Trump, as well as allegations the company had connections to Venezuela’s regime.
“All I can tell you is that well, the company might have somehow severed or tried to sever the relationships recently, I don’t know how they are parsing their words, but I can tell you that the company was started with Venezuelan money in Venezuela for the express purpose of rigging elections for Hugo Chavez,” Powell said. Powell also said that somebody could remotely observe the votes and overturn them in real-time.
“We have evidence now of information from the systems going to three or four different foreign countries during the time of the election, those countries themselves could have watched the live votes come in and changed the numbers,” said Powell. “There’s significant evidence of foreign interference from the worst communist countries on the Earth with our election.”
Dominion has repeatedly dismissed that it has links with Venezuela, Cuba, or any other countries, saying that it also has no links to Smartmatic, another election software firm that was founded by Venezuelan engineers years ago. Smartmatic has also dismissed the Trump legal team’s claims.
Dominion said that it acquired assets from Sequoia, a previous subsidiary of Smartmatic in 2010.
“Dominion is plainly a non-partisan American company with no ties to Venezuela or Cuba,” Dominion told news outlets on Thursday. “Vote counts are conducted by county and state election officials, not by Dominion, or any other election technology company—our systems support tabulation by those officials alone.”
The firm also said it did not run systems in some disputed territories such as Philadelphia, Milwaukee, and Wisconsin’s Dane County.
But Powell said they have “got all kinds of evidence that is mathematically irrefutable by experts, including three professors at Princeton, and it all proves the same thing, the evidence of individual poll watchers who saw votes come in, saw the machines manipulated.” She did not supply evidence in the interview or point to any figures, though we might see evidence soon enough.
Her statements Friday came after Tucker Carlson of Fox News and others, including Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), requested that evidence would be brought up to back up the claims.